The city does not exist outside of cultural production that can be implemented. According to Marc Augé "the culture site is localized in time and space." From here, by contrast, the site is not a technical answer to a problem isolated from the local context, not the site is not "localized" culture through time and space, layering does not work for slow, is not the result of a collective writing .
The place is not the effect of problem solving, how to tackle one problem at a time in the city is achieved through the construction of some monofunctional artifact. The shopping center, airport, train station, the museum, the highway, are the classic responses to a single technical problem: the consumer, the arrival of the planes, trains, display of works, automotive mobility. Closed in
double bind opposition between problem and solution, the city is struggling with no way out. Most often the problem is merely a symptom of a hidden evil and never investigated and the solution is a temporary stopgap measure, capable of continuing the cause of the illness over time. The opposition
problem solution remains on the surface, puts before the eyes by removing the visual problems to look beyond, to design.
must shift the focus from object-relations solution to , the observer is always part of the coverage, as well as a good doctor is part of the disease.
In the city people and the built meet and collide, diverge and converge in a dynamic flow. In the words of Aldo Van Eyk, Dutch architect anticipation of participation, the city, as the mind and dreams is kaleidoscopic.
In non-places are represented by urban machines that solve technical problems, there is no room for citizens producers of "sense" but only for consumers of services and functions. Technical machines provided not out of order, it should be noted that only work on a mass level and have always failed at the level of the individual.
The city must be co-produced by citizens who live, production of meaning and cultural production to be translated into the artifacts and demolitions. The city is alive as long as it produces, if it becomes a container in which to consume events produced externally, dies.
The city is exposed to viral contamination of the Other.
problem solving prefer dissolving problem, only investigating the causes, which may be very distant in time and space, we can dissolve the problem, ie the symptoms, which clouded her vision and prevent us la coproduzione urbana.
La città si abita, in questo abitare si stratifica la memoria e si inscrivono i desideri.
La memoria urbana non è l'estatica contemplazione della reliquia del passato, è produzione e proiezione, è effetto dei flussi di desideri, è costruzione di un'identità instabile e mutagena.
L'annullamento dell'interesse comune a favore dell'interesse privato si attua attraverso un gigantesco scippo di beni collettivi a favore del profitto individuale. Oggi si possono individuare chiaramente, nella città, due modi di agire contrastanti quello della società civile e quello di chi opera per la razionalizzazione speculativa the city.
The inhabitants, civil society, motivates and stimulates a new living space, promotes non-exclusive use of space, flexibility and self-organization.
speculative rationalization of the city works to fragmentation and specialization, is impervious to the flow of people and information, resists change opposing rigid system, bureaucracy rules, download the public costs and privatizing profits.
The mechanising is the long arm of the subject master of nature (Adorno).
Ecology 1. According to the law of tolerance Shelford reproduction of a species is one of the advanced features which takes place only within the limits of livability of a room, to define the level of livability of a city is thus possible to take the birth rate as an indicator?
Ecology 2. Liebig's Law of the living environment is determined by the ecological factor that is present in smaller quantities than needed. Since humans do not live entirely on contributions from biological, eat, drink, make nests, which are the urban elements present in smaller quantities that affect the livability?
The interests of the community, citizens must find within democratic decision-making power to bind and orient the forms and ways of urban development.
must challenge and fight the legality of current practices of management of urban transformation, but the battle can not be defensive, you must exit from the speech imposed by the opponent, and establish a new culture that will lead to proposals Other the city, not counter- or simple answers.
The otherness of the proposed changes to the affirmation of the common good earth, like water common good, and the identification of the liberated areas blackmail from the functionalist, the Market, the rigidity. The
does not undermine the common land titles, but says the prevalence of the common areas on the transformation and in particular seeks to protect agricultural funds totally and permanently, by binding to the very existence of the city and its food self-sufficiency.
Giving barracks and acquire farms?
The body and the scene in the production or the inseparability of space, relationship, sense of culture.
private cases must be reported within an overall strategy for public action.
The same principle of justice that applies to access to resources must apply to the accessibility of urban spaces. In the new
espansioni urbane assistiamo all'affermarsi dello spazio anonimo da vestire con elementi semplici di comunicazione.
La strada deve essere l'espansione pubblica degli spazi privati, il luogo di incontro regolato dal principio di prossimità. La prossimità è un complesso intreccio relazionale, emozionale, economico dato da tutto ciò che s’incontra lungo un percorso, principalmente pedonale, e che costituisce uno dei fondamenti dell’esistenza stessa della città.
Bisogna lavorare sull’accessibilità e non sul mezzo di trasporto; bisogna far sì che l’accesso alle attività economiche e personali avvenga riducendo il peso dei veicoli a motore sulla città. Città compatta, riduzione delle distanze per le necessità quotidiane, nuova gerarchia dei mezzi di trasporto che privilegi il pedone, il ciclista, chi usa il bus, e penalizzi chi usa l’auto privata: sono queste le strategie messe in atto in mezza Europa dalle città che funzionano.
Le parole famose di un assessore alla viabilità: “L’obiettivo del Comune resta quello di ridurre il traffico e di aumentare il numero dei parcheggi in centro.” Forse per stimolare i cittadini a lasciare le macchine ferme?
